new version of Explorer++ from recent sources [upd 29/03/16]
Re: new [updated] version of Explorer++ from most recent sou
I am currently using the 64-bit: [updated 07/02/2016] version, seems good, stable except for the apps bar (I have about 20 apps) aren't loading nor are there any icons except for a few like notepad and write... tried to create new one, no icon and doesn't load... weird.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Re: new [updated] version of Explorer++ from most recent sou
Thanks for the new version dilosec !
This is my favorite explorer ,simple and clean .
Just needs a bit more work and it would be perfect .
I
This is my favorite explorer ,simple and clean .
Just needs a bit more work and it would be perfect .
I
Re: new [updated] version of Explorer++ from most recent sou
Hi dilosec,
Version 1.3.2016.0207 fixes the right-click file pane crash. Thanks!
However, it seems that the bookmark feature does not appear to work at all.
I can add a bookmark to the bookmarks toolbar, but it is completely non-functional, and the bookmark disappears after restarting of Explorer++.
Please advise.
Thanks
Bill
Version 1.3.2016.0207 fixes the right-click file pane crash. Thanks!
However, it seems that the bookmark feature does not appear to work at all.
I can add a bookmark to the bookmarks toolbar, but it is completely non-functional, and the bookmark disappears after restarting of Explorer++.
Please advise.
Thanks
Bill
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:46 am
Re: new [updated] version of Explorer++ from most recent sou
The old bookmarks code was buggy, so I set out to rewrite it. Unfortunately, I never finished the work and the bookmarks code is in a half-implemented state. The fact that it doesn't work is also what's holding up any future release.abqbill wrote: However, it seems that the bookmark feature does not appear to work at all.
I can add a bookmark to the bookmarks toolbar, but it is completely non-functional, and the bookmark disappears after restarting of Explorer++.
Sorry about that! I'm not sure when it will be fixed.
Re: new [updated] version of Explorer++ from most recent sou
Thanks for the explanation. No worries! As an aside, the old bookmark system always worked fine for me.David Erceg wrote:The old bookmarks code was buggy, so I set out to rewrite it. Unfortunately, I never finished the work and the bookmarks code is in a half-implemented state. The fact that it doesn't work is also what's holding up any future release.
Sorry about that! I'm not sure when it will be fixed.
Bill
Re: new version of Explorer++ from recent sources [upd 29/03
I've updated post#4 (removed download links), and post#1 (new download links).
I've added 2 new options in 'Tools', 'Options...', 'Files and Folders' tab (at the bottom):
[x] Display mixed files and folders
[x] Sort names in non-logical order
Check/Uncheck the boxes as required...
I've added 2 new options in 'Tools', 'Options...', 'Files and Folders' tab (at the bottom):
[x] Display mixed files and folders
[x] Sort names in non-logical order
Check/Uncheck the boxes as required...
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:33 am
Re: new version of Explorer++ from recent sources [upd 29/03
Hello. I am trying the 3/29 version. So far it does not crash on right click (the issue I had with the original version with W10). However, it will not open more than one tab when I try to open folders on Desktop or Start. I can manually make new tabs. When I click on something outside E++, it will not open it even in the current tab.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:33 am
Re: new version of Explorer++ from recent sources [upd 29/03
No one else with this issue?
Re: new [updated] version of Explorer++ from most recent sou
How did you do that?abqbill wrote:As an aside, the old bookmark system always worked fine for me.
Just installed the old version of the program?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:33 am
Re: new version of Explorer++ from recent sources [upd 29/03
Along with my above issue, I realized the Command Prompt button is missing.
Otherwise with these two things, it is working on W10 without failure.
Otherwise with these two things, it is working on W10 without failure.